EO 14398 and FAR 52.222-90 Updates — What Government Contractors, Brokers, and HR Practitioners Need to Know
On March 26, 2026, Executive Order 14398 (Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors) marked a meaningful shift in how compliance is evaluated in federal procurement. Together with new FAR guidance, the Order reinforces a clear message: anti-discrimination expectations are no longer just policy commitments – they are contract performance requirements.
For federal contractors, this change is less about rewriting policies and more about understanding how everyday business decisions may now be viewed through a compliance lens.
Quick overview
- EO 14398 prohibits “racially discriminatory DEI activities”, defined as disparate treatment based on race or ethnicity in employment, contracting, or access to internal programs. These requirements are implemented through a new FAR clause that agencies are required to incorporate into most federal contracts performed in the United States.
- In practice, this means that agencies are increasingly focused on how decisions are administered, not just how they are described.
Where Contractors Are Likely to Feel the Impact
Employment and Talent Decisions – routine activities – such as hiring, promotion, compensation, and workforce development – are now more directly tied to contract compliance. Contractors should expect greater attention to whether decisions are objectively supported and consistently applied.
Training, Mentoring, and Internal Programs – The Order explicitly covers participation in training, mentoring, and leadership programs. The way access to these programs is structured and documented may matter just as much as the program design itself.
Managerial Discretion and Consistency – Front-line managers play a central role. Day-to-day supervisory decisions, performance feedback, and development opportunities can create compliance exposure if applied inconsistently or without clear, objective support.
Subcontractor Oversight – Prime contracts remain accountable for flowing applicable requirements down to subcontractors and for addressing noncompliant conduct. Routine subcontractor monitoring is becoming an expected part of contract performance.
Short‑term actions (do these now)
- Review and sign any contract modifications that incorporate the clause required by EO 14398 when requested by the contracting officer or agency.
- Run focused audits covering pay, classifications, promotions, training, to ensure that there are no remaining policies that distinguish by race or ethnicity and that there is no disparate treatment based on race or ethnicity in business operations related to any federal contract.
- Require subcontractor attestations plus verification steps; don’t rely on blind certifications.
Long‑term implications
- Anticipate higher compliance costs (audits, training, legal reviews to policies and practices) and more procurement scrutiny.
- Firms with strong, documented compliance of will stand out in source selection.
What government contract brokers should expect
- Factor compliance and oversight costs into pricing and schedules.
- Help clients assemble disclosure packages confirming that all business activities related to federal contract performance treat contracting parties equally and have the packages ready for contracting officers, when requested.
What HR practitioners should expect
Review all hiring, employee development programs, mentoring initiatives, and training opportunities to ensure all are race-neutral and objectively based and based on merit. Practices such as race-restricted applicant pools or preferences tied to ethnicity create risk under EO 14398.
Invest in training and recordkeeping tools to support disclosure requirements and DEI monitoring. Inconsistent application of standards – even unintentional – may expose contractors to audits and risk penalties including suspension or debarment.
Key Risks and Considerations
- Unverified subcontractor attestations increase risk of penalties, including debarment.
- Front-line managers play a critical role in compliance. Day-to-day supervision, performance feedback, and development opportunities must be administered without reference to race or ethnicity.
- Treat compliance as ongoing performance management, not a one‑time task.
EO 14398 reflects a broader shift in federal contracting: compliance is increasingly evaluated through conduct, not just policy. Contractors that understand where everyday operations intersect with contract obligations – and that can demonstrate consistency in how programs are administered – will be better positioned as enforcement accelerates in 2026.
If your organization is assessing how EO 14398 may intersect with day-to-day operations, now is a good time to review administrative consistency and documentation. Conversations with trusted advisors can help clarify risk areas and readiness without disrupting core business activities.
How The Boon Group and GSA National can help
We provide objective standardized administration of benefits and help promote consistency across similarly situated employees. We also maintain auditable records that demonstrate consistent program operation. Our goal: minimize disruption, control cost, and turn compliance into a differentiator.
DOL Announces 2025 Increased Health & Welfare Rates for SCA-Covered Contracts
The Department of Labor has announced the following fringe benefit (Health & Welfare) rate increases for SCA-covered contracts: $5.55 per hour (increase from $5.36) $5.09 per hour for EO...
Embracing Wellness in 2024: Your Guide to New Year's Resolutions
“New year, new you!” Isn’t that always how the saying goes? The threshold of a brand-new year inspires introspection and planning ahead; which is why New Year’s resolutions have become such a...
Common Tax Scams and How to Avoid and Respond
The annual tax season begins in mid-January and goes through mid-April. During this period, taxpayers lose millions of dollars each year as a result of tax scams and the uptick in cybercrime,...